Lloyds Banking Group, Hornby, Alix Partners, Accenture, Deloitte, Lloyds TSB, LV=, BP, and many more.
Hollis newsletter recipients can access the conference for just £225 +VAT (a £50 saving on advertised ticket price) when quoting HS1 and booking your ticket by the 31st October 2012.
Over 3,500 delegates have attended Think!Sponsorship conferences with over 90% of delegates saying they would recommend the event to a friend or colleague.
Book your ticket before 31st October 2012 by emailing catherine@thinksponsorship.com quoting HS1. To find out more about the event visit www.thinksponsorship.com or call on 020 8 534 4422.

With regard to the Olympics, the debate focused on whether brands like McDonalds and Coke should be allowed to associate themselves with such events. But running in parallel was a sustained attack on the alcohol industry by both the health lobby and the House of Commons Health Select Committee.

The assault began in early July, with the BMA arguing that the alcohol industry should be banned from sponsoring sport and music events to limit the promotion of its products to children and young adults. “Sponsorship,” said the BMA, “usually involves providing money to underwrite the event in return for having a logo prominently displayed or distributed on items such as caps and T-shirts and around the event venue. Children and adults become walking billboards when they wear these.”

The BMA’s intervention was in response to legislation being proposed by the Scottish Labour Party – which the BMA didn’t feel went far enough. But the debate intensified in late July when the House of Commons’ cross-party Health Committee also said tough measures could be required because the alcohol industry is still not doing enough to tackle the fact that there are around 6500 alcohol-related deaths a year in the UK.

While various issues were discussed, the most interesting comments came from committee chairman Stephen Dorrell, who said the industry was not being honest about the motivation for its advertising spend. In a damning observation, he said: “We don’t think the industry has a sufficiently well-developed sense of what it takes to trade responsibly.”

Dorrell’s point strikes right at the heart of the debate about alcohol advertising and sponsorship. While the industry argues that its marketing activity is purely about encouraging brand loyalty or brand switching, Dorrell’s committee shares the health lobby’s view that it also helps recruit new drinkers.

The Committee’s report couldn’t be clearer on this point, criticising the industry’s “implausible” argument that “advertising messages have no effect on public attitudes to alcohol or on consumption. Those involved in advertising alcoholic products should accept that their advertisements contain positive messages about their products and that these messages are supported by considerable economic power.”

The Portman Group, which represents the drinks industry on social responsibility issues, was “deeply disappointed” with the Committee’s conclusions. There are a couple of reasons for this. Firstly, it doesn’t believe that the science backs up Dorrell’s contention that there is a link between alcohol advertising and drinker recruitment. Secondly, it believes its members are working hard to tackle the problem identified by the health lobby – via various measures such as its responsible drinking campaign, the removal of alcohol branding from children’s replica sports kits and its unit reduction pledge, which will see a reduction in the alcohol content of leading brands, and the introduction of new lower alcohol products.

But what should sponsorship practitioners and rights holders maker of it all? After all, it’s not just the drinks industry that would be affected if the healthy lobby’s concerns translated into a sponsorship ban. For agencies, the knock-on effect of such an outcome would be the loss of key accounts – an awful thought in the midst of the current recession. Meanwhile at rights holders, it would mean the loss of revenue to hold events, pay wages and finance infrastructure developments.

Well there are two responses. The first is to make sure that they enforce best practice on their respective industries. By behaving proactively, they might encourage a more positive response from policy-makers, thus heading off a total ban.

To its credit, the European Sponsorship Association has started thinking along these lines. Conscious that there is also a threat to alcohol sponsorship at EU level, it has drawn up a set of guidelines for rights holders with regard to alcohol sponsorship.

There are too many measures to mention here, but the point of the guidelines is that they attempt to introduce a notion of best practice with regard to alcohol sponsorship. For example, rights holders are advised to “only allow sponsorship by alcohol companies where the audience is reasonably expected to be adults older than the legal purchase age” and to “encourage responsible consumption with their associated organisations, memberships, clubs, participants and supporters.” They should also “respect the choice of consumers not to drink alcohol and should never portray abstinence or moderation negatively.”

The second response is to start thinking about what life beyond alcohol sponsorship might look like. While there’s no guarantee that a ban (either total or partial) will come into force, prudent planning suggests that the industry should instigate a research-based assessment of alternative funding sources. Which brands might step into the breach if there is an alcohol ban? Which industrial categories have avoided sponsorship or been blocked from sponsorship because of the drinks sector’s pre-eminence?

Equally, the industry should start exploring whether relationships with the drinks industry can take other forms. Banning alcohol advertising and sponsorship won’t kill off all forms of commercial partnership (it is not for example a ban on stadia pouring rights or retail promotions). Some attempt should be made to see what kind of relationships would still be acceptable – and also whether the companies in question have other, non-alcohol, brands in their overall group portfolio. This is the kind of thing that the TV industry (via Thinkbox) or Radio (via RAB) would do – and have been doing for many years.

This kind of analysis is not just important for commercial reasons, but also because the sponsorship industry needs

to demonstrate its independence. It can’t allow itself to blindly follow vested interests. Nor can it turn a blind eye to the fact that there is widespread concern about alcohol abuse from a number of areas. Ireland, for example, is considering following the French with its own ban. And twelve of Australia’s national sporting organisations have just turned their backs on alcohol sponsorship by joining a government-funded programme.

None of this is to say that The Portman Group isn’t persuasive in some of its arguments, or that alcohol brands have not been good for sport. But a truly progressive sponsorship sector should be challenging its own presumptions and asking itself whether we are on the verge of an epochal shift in attitudes to alcohol. The Portman Group would like to see research in Loi Evin’s impact, so maybe ESA’s French contingent should consider how that might be done, adding thought leadership to the kind of post-ban commercial analysis advocated above.

What’s clear above all is that the sponsorship industry was smart enough to survive the loss of tobacco sponsorship. So it shouldn’t fear the upheaval caused by an alcohol ban. If anything, it might lead to a welcome shake-up in approach, led by dynamic agency thinking and a new wave of brands.

Alcohol Brands In Sports Sponsorship

The healthy lobby estimates drinks firms spend £800 million a year on marketing their products. Here are a few of the more high profile sponsors to be found in sport. Some also sponsor entertainment events, which could also be affected by a ban.

Budweiser: AB InBev’s lead brand is FIFA World Cup sponsor

Carling: Sponsor of Scottish FA and Scotland Team

Carlsberg: Euro 2012 sponsor and former Liverpool FC sponsor

Diageo: Sponsor of Ryder Cup via Johnnie Walker brand and Six Nations Rugby via Guinness

Heineken: Official Lager of London 2012, Rugby World Cup sponsor, sponsor of the Welsh rugby union team.

Marston’s: Official Beer of the England Cricket Team

Tennent’s: Celtic and Rangers sponsorship deal

restructuring and rebranding. The sports agency, which is a division of Chime, will now be known as “CSM Sport & Entertainment” (formerly Chime Sports Marketing). The Group w

ill be headquartered in the UK and will align all existing businesses under the four pillar brand companies: Essentially, Fast Track, Icon & Iluka. This will ensure clear delivery of complementary services across the sports marketing spectrum.
Earlier this month, the first example of the newly structured group, CSM Brazil, was launched in Rio de Janeiro. The Group’s other international offices will also go through the same transition in due course.
As well as looking ahead to opportunities around the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games, CSM Brazil has recently won the right to represent the four biggest football clubs in Rio de Janeiro. The joining of Botafogo, Flamengo, Fluminese & Vasco to form the Cariocas group is a milestone in the history of football in the country, with the commercial interest of all four clubs being represented by CSM Brazil.
Jim Glover, Group CEO, CSM Sport & Entertainment, said:
“We continue to build the CSM Sport & Entertainment business and its geographical reach through a combination of organic growth and acquisition.
“Starting this process with our office in Brazil is natural given the country’s upcoming international sporting focus. Our presence in the country has been expanding and it is a great honour to have been chosen to represent Cariocas, the landmark union of the four Rio based football clubs.
“We are excited to continue defining the Group behind the four pillar brands and we aim to embed the structure into all of our current and future offices. This vision will place us at the forefront of integrated sport and entertainment marketing.”
The CSM Sport & Entertainment group comprises 670 employees worldwide across 15 offices in 13 countries including: Abu Dhabi, Adelaide, Auckland, Cape Town, Doha, Dubai, Glasgow, Hong Kong, London, Madrid, Melbourne, Moscow Paris, Rio de Janeiro and Tokyo. The client list includes globally recognised rights holders, brands and organisations across more than 40 sports.
These include:
• Rights sales and athlete management
• Consultancy, events and PR
• Event bidding
• Branding and brand experience
• Major event services, logistics and hospitality

next generation of talent in the industry, the award spotlights the emerging talent in the marketing and media industries.

Biss Lancaster and Tangerine PR on a number of consumer PR programmes for clients including, ASDA, Galaxy, and Wilkinsons. In 2009 she moved into sports PR and has worked for clients such as Meindl and Puma.

and we are looking forward to working with Garuda Indonesia across many markets in order to capitalise on their rapid growth. It is an honour for us to be associated with a brand that has become a leading player in global aviation, and in particular, a brand that has its base in a region where we enjoy such a passionate fan base. Indonesia is an ambitious country with a rapidly growing economy which the Club has great affiliation with and where we hope to hold next year’s Pre Season Tour.”
Emirsyah Satar, President & CEO Garuda Indonesia, added:”As part of our continued efforts to build Garuda Indonesia into one of the global players in airline industry, this partnership provides us with great exposure in international markets. The global scale that LFC brings will support the initiative to increase exposure while LFC’s huge fan base all over the world enables us to introduce Garuda Indonesia and Indonesia in general to the world.”

185,000 hours a season reaching 212 territories and over 650 million homes with a cumulative global audience of 4.7 billion.

The sponsorship began on Saturday 7th July 2012, in parallel with the programme launch at 7.25pm on ITV1.
Superstar is a new ITV series following Andrew Lloyd Webber on his nationwide talent search to find the rock superstar. The winner’s life-changing prize will be the leading role in a new arena tour of the legendary rock opera Jesus Christ Superstar which will open at London’s O2 arena. Auditions have taken place across the country and the most promising new talent will go through to the live shows when the British public decide who they want to be their next Superstar. Amanda Holden will host the series, and Dawn French and Jason Donovan will join Andrew as judges for the live shows.
Rob Honeywood, Sponsorship Manager, Carat said: “This fully integrated sponsorship is a fantastic opportunity for Littlewoods to connect with their target market as ITV debuts its new Saturday night with a strategic sponsorship programme that will connect with consumers at every touch-point from TV and online to mobile.”

watch Becky McDonald’s dramatic exit from the show.
Simon Daglish, Group Commercial Director, ITV said: “We are delighted to be working with comparethemarket.com as a partner for Coronation Street. This is a long-term commitment from both parties around two of the most exciting and loved brands in the UK, which we believe will become the benchmark for partnerships going forward.”
Paul Galligan, Managing Director of comparethemarket.com said: “Coronation Street is one of Britain’s most entertaining and best loved TV shows and so we are delighted to be partnering with such a prestigious programme. We will be working closely with ITV to ensure this is a model partnership, utilising both on and off-air opportunities to take our brands to customers in new and exciting ways.”
Paul Constantine, Managing Partner at ZenithOptimedia said: “Coronation Street is the jewel in the crown of the ITV schedule and we are extremely pleased to have secured this partnership for comparethemarket.com in this highly competitive sector.”